Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Damages against Clearing House over Frozen Funds

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in local state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, including confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."
Justin Garcia
Justin Garcia

Tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and digital innovation trends across Europe.